Skip to main content

Resolve the ledger dimension in the a different account structure [AX 2012]

Recently I had a look at an error that occurred on a custom journal posting routine. It was somewhat similar the journal allocations by looking at existing transaction to make adjustment. What I didn’t know is the account structure has changed. An error popped up: Account structure X for the combination x-x-x-x-x, is not valid for the ledger X.

 image

When ever using ledger dimensions don’t just stamp the LedgerDimensionRecId. Use this method to resolve the RecId in the current account structure for the current company.

toLedgerDimension = DimensionDefaultingService::serviceCreateLedgerDimension(fromLedgerdimension);

I had to do a quick unit test to prove this. Below is a job that converts.

Code:
static void resolveLedgerDimension(Args _args)
{
//My expected values are
//Dimension display value = '1.1.4.2.03--'
//Account structure and dimension From RecId - Brazil - 52565566264
//Account structure and dimension Resolved RecId - Brazil SI - 22565539091
RecId fromLedgerdimension = 52565566264;
RecId toLedgerdimension;
toLedgerdimension = DimensionDefaultingService::serviceCreateLedgerDimension(fromLedgerdimension);
info(strFmt("From RecId %1 to %2", fromLedgerdimension, toLedgerdimension));
info(strFmt("From Display value %1 to %2",
conPeek(AxdDimensionUtil::getLedgerAccountValue(fromLedgerdimension), 1),
conPeek(AxdDimensionUtil::getLedgerAccountValue(toLedgerdimension), 1)));
info(strFmt("From Account structure %1 to %2",
DimensionStorage::getAccountStructureFromLedgerDimension(fromLedgerdimension).Name,
DimensionStorage::getAccountStructureFromLedgerDimension(toLedgerdimension).Name));
}



In the AOT I found a dimension combination that existed in 2 account structures that are the same.


image


image

Popular posts from this blog

AX - How to use Map and MapEnumerator

Similar to Set class, Map class allows you to associate one value (the key) with another value. Both the key and value can be any valid X++ type, including objects. The types of the key and the value are specified in the declaration of the map. The way in which maps are implemented means that access to the values is very fast. Below is a sample code that sets and retrieves values from a map. static void checkItemNameAliasDuplicate(Args _args) { inventTable inventTable; Map map; MapEnumerator mapEnumerator; NameAlias nameAlias; int counter = 0; ; map = new Map(Types::String, Types::Integer); //store into map while select inventTable { nameAlias = inventTable.NameAlias; if (!map.exists(nameAlias)) { map.insert(nameAlias, 1); } else { map.insert(nameAlias, map.lookup(nameAlias) + 1); } } //retrieve fro...

AX - How to use Set and SetEnumerator

The Set class is used for the storage and retrieval of data from a collection in which the values of the elements contained are unique and serve as the key values according to which the data is automatically ordered. You can create a set of primitive data types or complex data types such as a Class, Record or Container. Below is sample of a set of records. static void _Set(Args _args) {     CustTable       custTable;     Set             set = new Set(Types::Record);     SetEnumerator   setEnumerator;     ;     while select custTable     {         if (custTable && !set.in(custTable))         {             set.add(custTable);         }     }     if (!set.empty())     {    ...

Approve Workflow via email using template placeholders #Dyn365FO

Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations has placeholders which can be inserted into the instructions. Normally you would want this to show up in the email that is sent. One of the most useful ones is the URL link to the exact record that you are approving. In the workflow configurations use the placeholder and build up your message. Towards the end it has workflow specific ones. The URL token is %Workflow.Link to web% . For the technical people the token is replaced in this class WorkflowDocumentField. This is what I inserted into my email template. <BODY> subject: %subject% <BR> message: %message% <BR> company: %company% <BR> for: %for% <BR> </BODY> Should look like this. The final result looks like this. If you debug these are the place holders that are put together.